At our local bloggers’ meeting last night, we were discussing commenting.  It is my belief that unless pure spam or pure flame that comments should be approved.  (Heck, even Scoble has a little spam slip through occasionally.)

One of the participants is very selective about what comments he allows to be posted on his blog.  One of his points was that people in his community had been sued for liable for comments posted by a visitor.

I knew that people had been sued before over comments, but I had always figured that the comment poster, not the publisher, would be held accountable.

Anyway, the California Supreme Court has now set the precedent that “publishers could not be held liable for posting defamatory comments written by others.”

Internet publishers are thus protected by the Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act that grants immunity against defamation claims. 

Let your visitors and users post and comment at will!

2 Responses to “Web Publishers Immune for Defamation Comments”

  1. seamonkey420 Says:

    good to hear!

    i also believe in that unless spam or flame, it should be approved since it is a matter of opinion when it comes down to it. may not be my opinion or belief but still deserves to be seen/read.

  2. davak Says:

    Exactly. If somebody doesn’t validate one of my comments, that only insures that I will never comment on that site ever again.

Leave a Reply